Copyright © 2023. All Rights Reserved. Poker History. Editor: Erik Smith.
- History
- Online Poker Eras
- Online Poker Changes
- 2000: Poker Forums
- 2003: No Limit Hold'em
- 2003: Freerolls
- 2004: Poker Tournaments
- 2004: Rake Back Affiliates
- 2007: Solutions to Rakeback
- 2007: Result of Rakeback
- 2008: Italian Ring Fence
- 2008: Policy Changes
- 2010: Ongame Essence
- 2010: French Ring Fence
- 2011: Bodog Model
- 2011: Rake Distribution
- 2011: PokerStars New Rake
- 2012: Danish License
- 2012: Spain Regulated
- 2012: Party No Highstakes
- Online Poker Scandals
- UIGEA
- Black Friday
- News
- Networks
- Poker Network List
- Government Poker Networks
- Poker Rooms Sold
- 2004: Paradise Poker
- 2005: Noble Poker
- 2005: PokerChamps
- 2005: Multi Poker
- 2005: Ongame
- 2006: Empire Poker
- 2006: Tribeca Tables
- 2007: Noble Poker
- 2007: Poker.com Network
- 2007: Parbet
- 2007: Full Contact Poker
- 2007: Carlos Poker
- 2008: CDpoker
- 2009: Expekt Poker
- 2009: Everest Poker
- 2009: 24hPoker
- 2009: World Poker Tour
- 2011: Cake Network
- 2011: Centrebet
- 2011: Betsafe
- 2011: Entraction
- 2011: DoylesRoom
- 2011: Club4Aces
- 2012: NordicBet
- 2012: Bet24
- Poker Skins & Networks
- Closed Poker Networks
- Statistics
- Interviews
- Games
- Politics
- Poker Blog
UIGEA IN EFFECT
Submitted by Erik Smith on Wednesday, September 7, 2011 - 16:19
The Federal Reserve System in consultation with the Attorney General had 270 days to get the UIGEA into effect. It was required to enact regulations instructing financial service providers how to identify and block restricted financial transactions.1
When the law was passed the financial world was not ready for it meaning that they were not yet able to block all gambling transactions.
There were billions of transactions being processed every day in America and it took a while before banks were able to classify which transactions were connected to gambling thereby falling under the UIGEA.
A system had to be put in place so that fantasy games for instance would still be processed since they are excluded from Unlawful Internet Gambling.
Some gaming operators were hanging in until the said system was implemented and after that they pulled out of the U. S. In some cases companies decided to cease operations all together as it was the case for the most respected Digital Gaming Network skin: Full Contact Poker2.
1 §5364 (a)
2 Pokerroomreview.com, June 11, 2007